 |
|
Page Contents Global court moves closer to reality The Price Of Free Corn (The Wild and Free Pigs of the Okefenokee Swamp) What The Government Won’t Tell You ! Counter-insurgency Propaganda Code Words
POLICE STATE, USA |
|
Global court moves closer to reality
UNITED
NATIONS: Despite heavy US opposition, the first permanent global
criminal court to try individuals for the world’s most heinous
crimes is only four nations shy of becoming a reality. ______________________________________________ License me, tag me, take all my pay. Tell me what to do, tell me what not to say. Take all my money, take all my stuff I'll give it all to you, though it's never enough. You can search me all over, I will never complain Nor fight you, contradict you, no matter what pain. Tell me again I can't think on my own I need you to tell me I can't own my own home. Take all my guns, take all my pride I will not defend myself, I'll only subside. Give me the chip, give me free food I know you're here to help us, so we know you are good. Give me the gas chamber, I will not ask why You're only doing what's best for us we know you won't lie. We worship you oh state you care for our needs We know you just love us and aren't thinking of greed. Tell us what to do, where to go, what to say, We'd better get on our knees and really start to pray. Our freedoms are leaving and some don't know why they don't have the time to care and it makes me cry. Poem by Linda Elston___________________________________________
(The Wild and Free Pigs of the Okefenokee Swamp) Some years ago, about 1900, an old trapper from North Dakota hitched up some horses to his Studebaker wagon, packed a few possessions– especially his traps – and drove south. Several weeks later he stopped in a small town just north of the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia. It was a Saturday morning – a lazy day – when he walked into the general store. Sitting around the pot-bellied stove were seven or eight of the town’s local citizens. The traveler spoke. "Gentlemen, could you direct me to the Okefenokee Swamp?" Some of the old-timers looked at him like he was crazy. "You must be a stranger in these parts," they said. "I am. I’m from North Dakota," said the stranger. "In the Okefenokee Swamp are thousands of wild hogs." one old man explained. "A man who goes into the swamp by himself asks to die!" He lifted up his leg. "I lost half my leg here, to the pigs of the swamp." Another old fellow said, "Look at the cuts on me; look at my arm bit off! Those pigs have been free since the Revolution, eating snakes and rooting out roots and fending for themselves for over a hundred years. They’re wild and they’re dangerous. You can’t trap them. No man dare go into the swamp by himself." Every man nodded his head in agreement. The old trapper said, "Thank you so much for the warning. Now could you direct me to the swamp?" They said, "Well, yeah, it’s due south – straight down the road." But they begged the stranger not to go, because they knew he’d meet a terrible fate. He said, "Sell me ten sacks of corn, and help me load it in the wagon." And they did. Then the old trapper bid them farewell and drove on down the road. The townsfolk thought they’d never see him again. Two weeks later the man came back. He pulled up to the general store, got down off the wagon, walked in and bought ten more sacks of corn. After loading it up he went back down the road toward the swamp. Two weeks later he returned and again bought ten sacks of corn. This went on for a month. And then two months, and three. Every week or two the old trapper would come into town on a Saturday morning, load up ten sacks of corn, and drive off south into the swamp. The stranger soon became a legend in the little village and the subject of much speculation. People wondered what kind of devil had possessed this man, that he could go into the Okefenokee by himself and not be consumed by the wild and free hogs. One morning the man came into town as usual. Everyone thought he wanted more corn. He got off the wagon and went into the store where the usual group of men were gathered around the stove. He took off his gloves. "Gentlemen," he said, "I need to hire about ten or fifteen wagons. I need twenty or thirty men. I have six thousand hogs out in the swamp, penned up, and they’re all hungry. I’ve got to get them to market right away." "You’ve WHAT in the swamp?" asked the storekeeper, incredulously. "I have six thousand hogs penned up. They haven’t eaten for two or three days, and they’ll starve if I don’t get back there to feed and take care of them." One of the old-timers said, "You mean you’ve captured the wild hogs of the Okefenokee?" "That’s right." "How did you do that? What did you do?" the men urged, breathlessly. One of them exclaimed, "But I lost my arm!" "I lost my brother!" cried another. "I lost my leg to those wild boars!" chimed a third. The trapper said, "Well, the first week I went in there they were wild all right. They hid in the undergrowth and wouldn’t come out. I dared not get off the wagon. So I spread corn along behind the wagon. Every day I’d spread a sack of corn. The old pigs would have nothing to do with it." "But the younger pigs decided that it was easier to eat free corn than it was to root out roots and catch snakes. So the very young began to eat the corn first. I did this every day. Pretty soon, even the old pigs decided that it was easier to eat free corn. After all, they were all free; they were not penned up. They could run off in any direction they wanted at any time." "The next thing was to get them used to eating in the same place all the time. So I selected a clearing, and I started putting the corn in the clearing. At first they wouldn’t come to the clearing. It was too far. It was too open. It was a nuisance to them." "But the very young decided that it was easier to take the corn in the clearing than it was to root out roots and catch their own snakes. And not long thereafter, the older pigs also decided that it was easier to come to the clearing every day." "And so the pigs learned to come to the clearing every day to get their free corn. They could still subsidize their diet with roots and snakes and whatever else they wanted. After all, they were all free. They could run in any direction at any time. There were no bounds upon them." "The next step was to get them used to fence posts. So I put fence posts all the way around the clearing. I put them in the underbrush so that they wouldn’t get suspicious or upset. After all, they were just sticks sticking up out of the ground, like the trees and the brush. The corn was there every day. It was easy to walk in between the posts, get the corn, and walk back out." "This went on for a week or two. Shortly they became very used to walking into the clearing, getting the free corn, and walking back out through the fence posts." "The next step was to put one rail down at the bottom. I also left a few openings, so that the older, fatter pigs could walk through the openings and the younger pigs could easily jump over just one rail. After all, it was no real threat to their freedom or independence. They could always jump over the rail and flee in any direction at any time." "Now I decided that I wouldn’t feed them every day. I began to feed them every other day. On the days I didn’t feed them the pigs still gathered in the clearing. They squealed, and they grunted, and they begged and pleaded with me to feed them. But I only fed them every other day. And I put a second rail around the posts." "Now the pigs became more and more desperate for food. Because now they were no longer used to going out and digging their own roots and finding their own food. They now needed me. They needed my corn every other day. So I trained them that I would feed them every day if they came in through a gate. And I put up a third rail around the fence. But it was still no great threat to their freedom, because there were several gates and they could run in and out at will." "Finally I put up the fourth rail. Then I closed all the gates but one, and I fed them very, very well. Yesterday I closed the last gate. And today I need you to help me take these pigs to market." -------------end of story– The price of free corn and the allegory of the pigs has a serious moral lesson. This story is about federal, state, and local money being extorted and used to bait, trap and enslave a once free and independent people. Government welfare, in its myriad forms has reduced not only individuals to a state of dependency, it has state and local governments on the fast track to elimination, due to their functions being subverted by the command and control structures of "revenue sharing" programs. If state governments would exercise their Constitutional powers, rights and authority, there would be no "revenue sharing" to share. State and local governments should protect the citizens from theft, robbery, coercion, and against all unconstitutional acts. Corruption starts on the local level. Local school boards and county tax appraisal boards are allowing public education to tax the citizenry and local business community into poverty. Public education has become little more than a social entertainment center under the guise of education. The state’s have received their fair share of pork as well. In 1978 the State of Texas collected $8,317,274,394.00. In 1988 they collected $20,241,863,929.00. In 1999 they collected $47,970,044,913.00. It is estimated that the State of Texas now has more than 5 TRILLION dollars in surplus. The State could hence forth operate indefinitely without any form of taxation operating on the interest and investments of it’s surplus. The second plank of the Communist Manifesto is a "Heavy progressive taxation". Please send a copy of this article to all your state and local elected leaders and other concerned citizens. Tell them: "Just say NO to free corn." The bacon you save may be your own. __________________________________________ What The Government Won’t Tell You ! Most Americans may think that the purpose of income tax is to finance the necessary operations of the government. It is not. That’s right. IT IS NOT! Congress had done an admirable job of that for some 137 years, without an income tax, and operated on a balanced budget without incurring a national debt. In fact, there were occasions Congress took in more money than it needed. And it is not needed today! Income tax as we know it, and as it is applied to the masses, is un-Constitutional! The chief purpose of the un-Constitutional taxes is to enrich the "banksters" who own the Federal Reserve, charging us interest on fiat currency (phony money). In making your income tax payments to the IRS, you would think your payment would go directly to the Treasury, right? WRONG! If you get your check back from your bank, it will often state, "Pay any Federal Reserve Bank, for debts incurred by the US Govt." "To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen, and with the other to bestow it on favored individuals...is none the less robbery because it is done under the forms of law and is called taxation." U.S. Supreme Court in Loan Association v. Topeka (1874). Does it not seem just a bit odd that a ‘heavy progressive or graduated income tax’ was enacted in 1913, coinciding with the Federal Reserve Act, and the debauching of our money by the Fed’s ‘elastic currency’ policies? Both ideas are straight out of the Communist Manifesto, and one is imperative in order to ensure the survival of the other. Few people have ever grasped the significance of this interrelationship. Contrary to IRS opinion and media propaganda, the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (which allegedly authorized the income tax) was never ratified. Bill Bensen and Red Beckman spent an entire year and went to the 48 states’ legislatures and found out something very shocking. Their exhaustively researched treatise, The Law That Never Was, Vol. 1 & 2, demonstrates unequivocally that the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified. It was simply declared to be ‘in effect’ by President Wilson’s Secretary of State, Philander Knox, on February 25, 1913. Knox’s own memorandums to his Solieitor show how specious his rationale was for doing so. It has always been unconstitutional for the U.S. government to directly tax individuals in their property, wages, salaries, and earnings (see Article 1, Sec.9). Even if the 16th Amendment were deemed valid, the Supreme Court has held that it created no new powers of taxation: ‘A proper regard for its genesis, as well as its very clear language, requires also that this (16th) Amendment shall not be extended by loose construction, so as to repeal or modify, except as applied to income, those provisions of the Constitution that require an apportionment according to population for direct taxes upon property real and personal. This limitation still has an appropriate and important function, and is not to be overridden by Congress or disregarded by the courts.’" Eisner v. Macomber, 252 US 189, 206 "Deceptive statements by IRS spokesmen and other propagandists have created great confusion as to whether limitations on direct taxes are still in effect. Some incorrectly claim that the 16th Amendment (the income tax amendment) changed the constitution limitations on direct taxes and authorized an income tax as a direct tax without apportionment. The judges of the U.S. Supreme Court rejected these claims in the case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, when they ruled that the 16th Amendment ‘created no new power of taxation’ and that it ‘ did not change the constitution limitations which forbid any direct taxation of individuals’." NCBA Bulletin (May, 1988). "The income tax is unconstitutional and was not part of the original intent of those who drafted our Constitution or government. I am supporting a resolution to repeal the 16th Amendment." Steve Symms, former member of the U.S. Congress. "(I)t probably is not necessary for the federal government to tax anyone directly; it could simply print the money it needs. However, that would be too bold a stroke, for it would then be obvious to all what kind of counterfeiting operation the government is running. The present system combining taxation and inflation is akin to watering the milk; too much water and the people catch on." Congressman Ron Paul "In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that, ‘If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff, the entire system will collapse." Senator Henry Bellmon (1969) "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance." U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187 "As a result of my efforts, it is my opinion, based on law, that no one is required to file a U.S. income tax return, no one is liable for income taxes, wages are not income, and income taxes are currently being collected in a manner that has already been held to be unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court." Dick Viti, Attorney-At-Law (based on a 6-year study of the Internal Revenue Code and Constitution. The President of the United States and every member of Congress takes an oath to uphold the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that "Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just power from the consent of the governed." Jefferson went on to say that "when they become destructive of these ends it is the right of the people to alter, or to abolish such governments. It is this power to control and even to abolish the government that has made our liberties real." Another conspiracy against American citizens, that the federal government just as soon you not find out about, is the New World Order. The modern roots of the New World Order go back before the time of our Declaration of Independence, and stems from a secret Luciferian society which espouses "illuminism." On May 1, 1776, the Order of Illuminati was established. A quest for total world rule by a select group of "enlightened ones." Rooted in satanic worship, the Illuminati’s stated agenda includes: 1. The destruction of Christianity. 2. The abolition of private property. 3. The abolition of inheritance. 4. The breakup of the family unit. 5. The destruction of patriotism. 6. The abolition of all national government. 7. The creation of a one world government. "The New World Order under the UN will reduce everything to one common denominator. The system will be made up of a single currency, single centrally financed government, single tax system, single language, single political system, single world court of justice, single state religion....Each person will have a registered number, without which he will not be allowed to buy or sell; and there will be one universal world church. Anyone who refuses to take part in the universal system will have no right to exist." Assessment of the New World Order by Fr. Kurk E. Koch, University professor who has lectured at 100 universities in 65 countries on 5 continents. His subjects of expertise are the New World Order, Occultism, and Extreme Movements. The United Nations (UN), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the Trilateral Commission are the representative sampling of the plethora of One Worlders, supported, funded, and controlled by the Illuminati, international financiers. "The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes." Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court Justice "The UN is the greatest fraud in history. Its purpose is to destroy the United States." Congressman John E. Rankin The federal government has assumed thousands of different programs that not only lack any Constitutional authority, but are categorically prohibited by the Constitution. As a result of what has been happening while the people have been sleeping, and not fully realizing what’s been taking place, the American people find themselves under a powerful despotism which has merged us into a socialist type of welfare state. Poverty discourages people from thinking for themselves, and allows the government to go beyond its Constitutional authority. "We operate here under directives which emulate from the White House...The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the U.S. so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union." Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation (1954) "We shall have World government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World government will be achieved by conquest or consent." James Paul Warburg (son of Paul Moritz Warburg, chief architect of the Federal Reserve Act), boasted confidently on February 17, 1950 before the U.S. Senate. Title-50 War and National Defense, 783 states- "It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to combine, conspire, or agree with any other person to perform any act which would substantially contribute to the establishment within the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, the direction and control of which is to be vested in, or exercised by or under the domination of control of, any foreign government." The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) are in violation of Title-50 War and National Defense -783. The Council on Foreign Relations has unlawfully and knowingly combined, conspired, and agreed to substantially contribute to the establishment of one world order under the totalitarian dictatorship, the direction and the control of members of Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and members of their branch organizations in various nations throughout the world. That is totalitarianism on a global scale. Get America out of the United Nations (UN), and get the UN out of America! The Constitution is not about the UN Charter, nor is the UN Charter about the Constitution. Wake Up America!!!!!!!! It’s your country, it’s your freedom, and it’s your money. You’re about to lose all three. When the people fear the government, you have tyranny! When the government fears the people, you have liberty! __________________________________________
__________________________
_____________________________ Counter-insurgency Propaganda Code Words by Anonymous
That's why we have the Department of Defense, rather than the Department of Killing People. The word Defense is friendly, and carries moral authority. When civilians (live Men, Women, and Children) are murdered by the Department of Killing People, the result is "collateral damage". Counter-insurgency propaganda code words re-label theft and murder to make them appear as "commerce" and "justice". The four organizations listed below employ code words to disguise their one true objective: Complete subjugation of the Human Race. Curiously, each claims a different justification in order to pursue this goal. Following is a description of the worlds primary code language generators, along with the moral claim of each. D.O.D. – Vote Delivery Machine, and Home for Unwed Mothers.
I.A.D.B. – Training camp for Tin Pot Dictators, including the American kind.
Interpol – Money watchdog. Makes sure everyone pays taxes somewhere.
NATO – World Government enforcement tool.
Now that we have examined the four sources of counter-insurgency propaganda code language, we can look at the specific code words that they employ: Covert Operations
Psychological Consolidation Activities
Psychological Media
Psychological Operations
Psychological Situation
Psychological Operations Approach
Psychological Warfare
Psychological Warfare Consolidation
Perception Management
In order to understand why organizations use these methods, it is worthwhile to examine the makeup of systems in general. A book by John Gall entitled Systemantics describes the nature of systems:
A system can be: a country, an organization, or a religion.
The ego-like qualities of this organizational consciousness cause each system to lust for ever greater power.
To justify this growth,
Eventually, the practical justification for a tax supported system grown huge disappears all together, leaving behind nothing but the naked lust for power.
It's probably too late to stop the current cycle of asset confiscation, currency debasement, and economic collapse. Our best hope is to train a new generation of American Citizens who are educated, brave, and willing to fight for their Freedom, they same way our Forefather's fought so many times before. __________________________
POLICE STATE, USA Posted: March 20, 2002
By Jon Dougherty The vast majority of states currently are considering a piece of model legislation that critics charge could turn out to be a major threat to civil liberties. According to the American Legislative Exchange Council, a Washington, D.C.-based small-government advocacy group, 34 states have begun considering the "Model State Emergency Health Powers Act," a bill that critics contend gives state governors unprecedented authority in the event of a terrorist attack or other threat to the public health. As reported by WorldNetDaily Jan. 10, the bill, if adopted as written, grants governors the power to order the collection of all data and records on citizens, ban firearms, take control of private property and quarantine entire cities. An initial version of the bill was drafted in October 2001, just a month after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, by The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, in collaboration with several other organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Ga. But as word – and criticism – of the measure spread, its authors released a second draft Dec. 21, though ALEC says much of the original intent remained unchanged. "While some of these changes reflect the concerns shared by groups interested in protecting and promoting civil liberties, other changes were merely cosmetic, inexplicable or altogether nonexistent," said a policy analysis paper issued by ALEC, which opposes the model bill. "Moreover, the release of a revised draft does not mask the original intent of the authors, nor does it prevent states that have already introduced the original draft from considering the original provisions," the group said. Jennifer King, the director of the Health and Human Services task force for ALEC, said that although "we're not breathing easy yet," most states so far have chosen to "water down" the model bill. She told WorldNetDaily that South Dakota is the first and only state thus far to pass the measure, but it, too, "was a fairly watered-down version." "It doesn't have all the offensive quarantine or ration language in it that the CDC model had," she said. But Minnesota "is very close to passing the closest version of the bill that we have seen," she said, though "it's still been watered down considerably to require some studying of certain aspects." Other states have been "active" in holding hearings regarding the bill. Mississippi, by contrast, "has killed the bill outright" – the only state so far to do so, she said. And in other "positive trends," at least two other states, Georgia and Oklahoma, "added in some language saying that if the governor declares the public health emergency, then the legislature has to come into session within 48 hours and vote it up or down," said King. "From our perspective, we found that to be quite positive," she said. "We should see a really hard push [in many states] in the next few weeks." The model bill's preamble recalls the events of Sept. 11, focusing attention on a "need to protect the health and safety of citizens from epidemics and bio-terrorism," according to one analysis. Since the terrorist attacks, federal officials have repeatedly warned that the threat of chemical, biological and even nuclear attack is "real." The Homeland Security Agency, under its director, Tom Ridge, has even issued a new color-coded warning system, to gauge the level of threat against the nation at any given time. But critics say the level of control that could be assumed by state authorities is unprecedented. An analysis by ALEC says the bill "strips individuals and families of their rights and liberties at the expense of government," while representing "unnecessary and duplicative legislation given existing state natural-disaster statutes." The bill, as written, "provides a number of potential legal loopholes for trial lawyers to extort," grants "overly sweeping rights to the government," and "fails to consider individual state needs," the group said. Also, the measure "consolidates broad powers" to unelected public health officials while it "erects barriers to states' ability to respond, slowing down response times." It also utilizes "vague language" to "define key concepts, including when an emergency can be declared," the ALEC analysis concluded. According to the measure, a
"public health emergency" is defined as:
"an occurrence or imminent threat of an illness or health condition, caused by bio-terrorism, epidemic or pandemic disease, or novel and highly fatal infectious agent or biological toxin, that poses a substantial risk of a significant number of human fatalities or incidents of permanent or long-term disability. Such illness or health condition includes, but is not limited to, an illness or health condition resulting from a national disaster." The bill's authors have defended the measure, however, saying they believe it is a necessary tool to give state authorities the power they need to deal quickly with unconventional threats to the public safety. Lawrence O. Gostin, director and principal investigator for the Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins, says there are no tools on the books for lawmakers and state chief executives to effectively deal with health emergencies such as bio-terrorism. "Current public health laws are too highly antiquated and inadequate to ensure a strong and effective response to biot-errorism," Gostin said. "Existing laws thwart public health officials in rapidly identifying and ameliorating health threats, thus jeopardizing the public's safety." And last fall, when the model bill was unveiled, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson hailed it as "an important tool for state and local officials to respond to bio-terrorism and other public health emergencies." However, some legal experts warn that even legislation that appears harmless or well-intended could be dangerous to civil liberties. "We should think always that every new law may be enforced by our worst enemies," B. Utley, the Robert A. Taft fellow in constitutional and international studies at the Ludwig von Mises Institute, told WND last October, after President Bush signed the USA Patriot Act of 2001. "As drafted, whether these threats are justified depends upon the opinion of only one person – the governor of a state," he said. Legislatures that may consider the bill at some point should "work to improve the model act to minimize the chance that a governor could make a mistake." Others contend the entire bill is unnecessary because governors already retain the authority to declare emergencies should one arise. The model bill, however, would override some of the civil-liberties protections built into current state statutes. About one-third of all state legislators are members of ALEC. It was founded in 1973 by a "small group of state legislators and conservative policy advocates … who share a common belief in limited government, free markets, federalism and individual liberty." |