|
American Republic
or
American Democracy
Beginning
in the late 60's, incidentally when the American Republic gave way
to
the American democracy, you, for wont of a better word, native-borns,
developed
new perceptions which have never ceased to amaze me. In a way they
remind
me of people who long ago gave up their dream for freedom
and
reconciled themselves to remain a ward of their government for the rest of
their
lives having convinced themselves that madness was sanity.
It seems there is now an incredible infatuation
with tripe beliefs: a true conviction that you can mix and
match,
completely oblivious to the fact that the resulting mixture will
assume
the characteristics of the worst element in the mixture, an inability
to
comprehend that gradual degeneration is no indication of evil's absence,
and
then the strangest of all, a belief that throwing enough money at the
problem
will make it go away.
What
struck here me is the statement that today's democratic party is
not
the old democratic party anymore. Not so my friend. It is still the
same,
just as evil then as it is now. Let me quickly add that anyone getting
carried
away by reading into this statement some extolling for the
republican
party is sadly mistaken.
Evil
requires no conception, has no gestation, no birth, and no childhood.
It is
simply and always there, always present. What was different then was
that
evil was held at bay, held at bay by justice, that feudal overlord to
whom
the colonists and the Founding Fathers had sworn allegiance and
obeisance.
Remove justice and evil is decaged.
Thus,
when the American Republic died and then replaced with the American
democracy,
justice became a casualty. Socialism, the core projection of any
democracy,
legalizes the taking of property belonging to others. That is
tantamount
to legalizing plunder, in fact it is legalized plunder
camouflaged
in the guise of securing the maximum good for the greatest
number
of people, and legalized plunder is injustice and injustice is the
absence
of justice, the old overlord. That is the simplest explanation why a
democracy
cannot discharge its fiscal affairs with money backed by silver
and
gold. Only fiat money, money backed by debt, can have legal tender here.
Thus
socialism unloosed a monster that scarcely can be fathomed.
Let
me see if I can get us all at least onto the same page. Picture yourself
falling
out of the top window of a 55-storied building. What sense does it
make
to argue that you are not dead, when passing the the 5th and then the
last?
Is it not certain you were for all intents and purposes dead the
moment
you fell? I find it, therefore, extremely dismaying, when I hear of
those
many proposals seeking to determine the moment our Republic received
her
deathblow. Some have it as early as 1803, when the Supreme Court
arrogated
to itself sole discretion to define justice. Some hold Lincoln
accountable,
some find in Wilson the perpetrator. All these have
philosophical
tender, but were not the deathblow that propelled us into
extinction.
The
ratification of the 17th Amendment in April of 1913 was. It opened the
top
window of the 55-storied building and it is here that the Republic fell.
In
1963 she past the window of the 5th floor, and sidewalk came in 1968,
when
the 1968 gun control act converted the right, the right to keep and
bear
arms, into permission. Then the American citizen ceased being sovereign
over
his government and government became his overlord and he its servant.
So
her fall lasted 55 years. The first 50 years she survived on
life-support
systems
which were removed when the Kennedy assassination levied the first
overt
and concerted attack on the Second Amendment. She lingered for another
5
years until the passage of the 1968 gun control act, when she finally
succumbed
to her illness.
Thus
we should be able to see that the passage of time is no indication that
evil
did not lurk in the shadows from the very beginning. And that is of
immense
importance to understand, if we are to have hope to recover our
Republic.
Knowing that we have a problem is not enough. Of what help is it
to
know that "five" is not the right answer? Even if we knew that
the right
answer
is "four", we still would have no solution, because four can
be two
plus
two, three plus one, ten minus six, and a myriad of other
possibilities,
but only one of them will give us the means by which we can
arrest
our destruction. Sovereignty, our sovereignty, is the right and the
only
answer.
And
that requires that in addition to explicating and identifying the
countless
pathogens devouring our Nation, we also must describe to our
neighbors,
loved ones, friends, and, yes, even strangers the incredible
symbiosis
between the American Republic, our liberties, and the Second
Amendment.
So
let me repeat, the democratic party was just as evil then as it is now,
for a
democracy is the embodiment of legalized plunder and the democratic
party
is its disseminating agency. And the republican party is now the same.
Imagination
only can place limits on the monstrosities inflicted on a
people,
when it is submerged in the endless vitriol of a democracy. Weigh
this
for a moment. What do you think the outcome will be, if a government,
in
the normal discharge of its responsibilities, acts as though evidence
were
not required and most certainly not needed, if in fact it considered it
absolutely
righteous to proceed on suspicion and innuendoes only? I know and
that
is why I need no physical evidence that we now have forced labor camps,
ex
post facto laws, unlawful incarceration, murder, etc., because, as I
said,
I know what a democracy is. The Nazi democracy taught me well, and
these
things are as natural to a democracy as heat is to fire, as flickering
is to
an open flame .
Let
us now also begin to understand that you cannot mix and match. Mixing a
democracy
with other political concepts does not in the least lessen the
counts
of my indictment. The Germans are the most prolific in determining
strange
and idiotic mixtures: free democracy - an oxymoron, social democracy
- a
redundancy, christian democracy - a blasphemy, democratic republic - an
absurdity
and a madness now spreading its insidious poison here on our
shores.
I
must ask, what do you have when you mix honey and arsenic? Do you have
honeyed
arsenic or arsenical honey? Is it not obvious you have neither? Is
it
not clear that all you have is poison? You have no idea how frustrating
it is
for me to have to realize that only very few understand. Perhaps my
having
been baptized in hell is the reason for my having no difficulties in
seeing
these things so clearly and that is why I fervently hope that none of
you
will ever have to be baptized in hell in order to comprehend these
things.
In
conclusion I need to make one last observation for today. Not a single
quote
attributable to the Founding Fathers, or to anyone imbued with the
willingness
to see that our Republic is destroyed, including Ayn Rand, comes
to
mind that does not express in most euphoric terms the beauty of
liberties,
not only in perception but also in eloquence. This is the reason
why I
believe we are all prone to cite them whenever an opportunity presents
itself.
But
what is forgotten, or at least overlooked, is that when these
scintillating
words exposed the immeasurable greatness of those who crafted
them,
they were spoken to secure an entrenched and recently assembled
Republic.
When we repeat them today, we repeat them to overcome an
entrenched
and well established democracy, seeking to restore the Republic.
Then
no explications were needed, now they are. It goes to solving the
problem
facing us and to solve a problem, you must not only know that you
have
a problem, you must also know what kind of a problem you have, how it
came
to be a problem, and, if possible, who made it a problem.
I do
not now remember how many I have asked if they could explain to me, for
example,
why the Colonists were angry at being taxed without representation.
No
one could give me the right answer. Oh, what frustration! The answer is
that
these great people knew themselves to be sovereign, to be king, and you
just
do not tax the king without his permission. That was the reason for
their
indignation. Then it was understood, now it must be explained, and
when
explained correctly it will go to restoring our Republic.
As
matters stand right now, all that can be argued is that you know we have
a
problem, but that is the extent of it. And here it seems to me that you
are
prone to compete with each other trying to discover him who has
uncovered
the most virulent pathogen yet.
I
heard it said that to be informed is to be vigilant. True! But so is the
monster!
Consider this. You have exposed forced labor camps! Have they been
dismantled?
You have exposed ex post facto laws! Have they been rescinded?
You
have exposed unlawful incarceration! Has that been corrected! You have
exposed
murders! Have they ceased? Know then this. A democracy, when in full
bloom,
can and will function on suspicion only.
Let
this then be our impetus to talk. I talk at every opportunity and it
works
almost every time. During a recent court hearing, to contest a $275.00
parking
fine and where I much to my chagrin neglected to note that the
citing
P.E.O. was not present, explicated to the judge, the clerk, and about
half
a dozen other miscreants the horrors of a democracy and the beauty
of
the
American Republic, now deceased, because it is the only form of
government
in which the citizen is sovereign and, therefore, has control
over
those to whom he has entrusted the safeguarding of, not his person, but
his
nation.
We
see then, all of us, that we have an inexhaustible supply of moments
which
we can exploit to exegete the marvels of sovereignty. If you will not
begin
to talk soon, you will have to learn to goose step. It is a most
invigorating
way to walk. The only redeeming feature, should you be
interested.
I
hope this my lament does not translate into an offense. That is not my
intent.
I had simply sought to show that the constant exposing of pathogens,
unless
accompanied by a reference to sovereignty, will only hasten our
complete
destruction and hurl us ever deeper into an irrecoverable chaos.
Dieter
on
6/13/03
|